Mark Green: Free Energy Trade is a Win-Win

  • Date: 21/12/13
  • Mark Green, Energy Tomorrow

“It’s undeniable that the American energy revolution has rendered our current export policies obsolete. By restricting the export of crude oil and liquefied natural gas, current policies also restrain job creation, economic growth and further production gains.” 

Momentum is building for revisiting decades-old restrictions on U.S. exports of oil and natural gas. For months we’ve talked about the benefits of exporting liquefied natural gas. Now the U.S. ban on crude oil exports also is being discussed. Earlier this month Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz said much has changed since the crude oil export ban was created:

“Those restrictions on exports were born, as was the Department of Energy and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, on oil disruptions. There are lots of issues in the energy space that deserve some new analysis and examination in the context of what is now an energy world that is no longer like the 1970s.”

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal (subscription required) and the Washington Post have called for an end to the crude oil export ban. With the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s newest outlook projecting continued growth in U.S. production of oil – nearing the 1970 record of 9.6 million barrels per day – and natural gas, discussion of exporting American energy makes economic sense. API’s Erik Milito, upstream group director, detailed the case for exporting crude and natural gas during a conference call with reporters:

“It’s undeniable that the American energy revolution has rendered our current export policies obsolete. By restricting the export of crude oil and liquefied natural gas, current policies also restrain job creation, economic growth and further production gains.”

Milito said America’s oil and natural gas industry, using advanced hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques, is turning the country’s vast shale reserves into jobs and economic growth. Unconventional oil and natural gas development has created more than 2.1 million jobs while adding more than $200 billion to U.S. GDP. Milito:

“We’ve come to a point in our energy present that could lead to a significantly better energy future.  … What we need to do is to embrace this energy renaissance we’re entering into. And to do that we need to make sure we’re looking at it from a broad energy policy perspective – removing obstacles to future growth.. … When you have these restrictions eased and lifted, you have more jobs.”

Studies show the export of liquefied natural gas (LNG) would generate broad positive economic impact without risking domestic supply affordability. EIA’s new outlook found that U.S. natural gas reserves are large enough to supply domestic and international demand without adversely affecting energy security or domestic prices. Milito:

“Increased access to overseas markets will stimulate even more domestic production, which is why studies consistently show the most robust export scenarios generate the highest levels of job and economic benefits. The same supply and demand principles hold true for crude oil. … Exporting a portion of our abundant crude oil supply would provide greater stability to the global supply while creating jobs and generating revenues stateside.”

Trade is a win-win for the United States. The export of a valuable commodity brings wealth into this country, supporting expanded domestic energy development, job creation and economic growth.

Full comment